Home
Subscribe | Advertise | Place an Ad | Archives | E-edition | RSS Feeds | Contact Us
Site search
sponsored by
 
Welcome, Guest 
avatar

Please enter the following information:

Email:
Password:
  Remember Me
 
  Forgot Password?
  Become a Member
  Close Window
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Jobs
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Autos
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Real Estate
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Classifieds
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Search local dealer inventory and private seller listings
Search for homes by MLS, classified listings, rentals, and much more!
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Home
<< back
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
Timeshare industry wants tax relief


Print Comment
BRECKENRIDGE — The timeshare industry wants the town to stop charging a real estate transfer tax on owners who upgrade the quality of their weeks within their complex.

“I am here to emphasize a fairness issue,” said Tobias Weas, counsel for the American Resort Development Association.

Weas and owners at local complexes such as the Valdoro Lodge object to the town collecting its 1 percent real estate transfer tax on upgrades.

Other big Breckenridge timeshare projects include Gold Flake, Grand Timber lodge, the Marriott and Hyatt’s Main Street Station.

An example would be that if an owner upgrades a $30,000 summer week to a $40,000 winter week, current law taxes the entire $40,000 transaction and not the $10,000 upgrade.

Weas said the tax is unfair because the owner is trading the $30,000 week back to the developer to be sold to somebody else, and only paying $10,000.

Weas argued that an upgraded timeshare represents a shift in time, not a bigger piece of real estate.

Councilmembers J.B. Katz and Eric Mamula wondered how that should be treated differently than any other real estate upgrade when under Colorado law the shift is still a deeded transaction.

Weas said the difference is that the upgrades he wants to protect occur in the same complex with the same developer.

He also said the timeshare does not build equity like traditional real estate.

“We are not an equity-building home owning product,” he said. “We are a vacation use product.”

Town manager Tim Gagen said it’s difficult to figure what revenue the town would lose, but in the last two years, timeshare resales generated $108,000 in 2003 and $87,000 in 2004.

Town officials will research how other towns with real estate transfer taxes treat timeshare upgrades and report back to council.

Councilmember Rob Millisor, a timeshare business owner, recused himself from the discussion.

Jim Pokrandt can be reached at (970) 668-3998, ext. 227, or jpokrandt@summitdaily.com.


Print del.icio.us digg reddit
Other Top Items
Related Articles
Most Recommended Articles
Comments
About Us | Staff | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Swift Communications