Site search
sponsored by
 
Welcome, Guest  avatar

Please enter the following information:

Email or Screen Name:
Password:
  Remember Me
 
  Forgot Password?
  Become a Member
  Close Window
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Jobs
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Autos
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Real Estate
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Classifieds
Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Search local dealer inventory and private seller listings
Search for homes by MLS, classified listings, rentals, and much more!

Summit Daily News | Covering Breckenridge, Keystone, Frisco, Dillon, Silverthorne, Copper | Colorado
Home  >  >
<< back
Thursday, September 14, 2006

Court voids agreements on Gunnison River water in Black Canyon



Print Comment
DENVER — Agreements between the federal government and Colorado that environmentalists said could have harmed fish and other wildlife dependent on the water flowing though the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park have been thrown out by a federal judge.

Environmentalists argued in a lawsuit that the Gunnison River flowing through the spectacular gorges of the 14-mile long park needed both a minimum and a peak flow in order to maintain its ecosystem.

Agreements reached by the Interior Department and the state in 2003 established a minimum flow for the river through the park, but said peak flows above that could be diverted to other uses, such as to farming.

State and federal officials said they would protect the park and preserve the river for other uses.

However, the agreement meant the government surrendered its senior water right, established in 1933 when the canyon was deemed a national monument, and allowed the river to be diverted by farmers, ranchers, cities and utilities.

In his 32-page ruling released Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Clarence Brimmer wrote that giving up the canyon’s older water rights was “nonsensical” and disagreed with the government’s argument.

“The agreements were not to ensure the protection of the canyon because the Black Canyon was already protected,” Brimmer wrote.


Print del.icio.us digg reddit
Comments
Previous Guide Line
Next Guide Line
Order my comments by:
About Us | Staff | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Swift Communications