Site search
sponsored by
News
WASHINGTON — U.S. Sens. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., and Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., on
Wednesday co-sponsored an amendment to the federal government’s proposed
2009 budget that would create a “deficit neutral reserve” fund to help
reverse a reduction in payments states receive from federal mineral lease
revenues.
A statement from Salazar’s office said the amendment would create room in
the 2009 budget for Congress to help repeal language that reduces the
current share of revenues states receive from leases for energy and mineral
extraction on federal lands by 2 percent. The reduction means states get 48
percent of the proceeds, and the federal government 52 percent.
The 2 percent reduction measure was inserted into a $555-billion spending
bill late last year at the request of the Bush Administration. Salazar voted
for the bill, while Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., did not.
“Restoring funds that the Bush Administration is attempting to pilfer from
our state is a primary goal of mine,” Salazar said in the statement. “This
is an issue that goes beyond Colorado and impacts several states that depend
on mineral leasing revenues. I have worked and will continue to work to
equalize this split between the state and the federal government, and to
ensure that Colorado receives its fair share of revenue.”
Earlier this year, Salazar, Reps. John Salazar, D-Manassa, and Mark Udall,
D-Eldorado Springs, submitted legislation that would restore the traditional
50-50 split between the federal government and the states from revenue
generated from federal mineral leasing activity.
Steve Wymer, a spokesman for Allard, said the amendment is not necessary and
that the only thing necessary is for the Senate Interior Appropriations
Committee, of which Allard is the ranking Republican member, is to make sure
that revenue split language is not again inserted into the 2009 budget.
“We could use (Salazar’s) support in convincing the (chairwoman) of that,”
Wymer said.
The revenue-split change has raised concerns in places such as Garfield
County, which leads the state in natural gas drilling and relies on mineral
lease revenues to help deal with the impacts.
The revenue-split change that was inserted into the $555-billion
appropriations bill was only for the 2008 fiscal year. However, President
Bush’s budget for the government’s 2009 fiscal year, submitted to Congress
in early February, suggested extending the provision by another year,
something Salazar hopes to prevent.
The 2 percent taken away from states will be used by the Department of
Interior in administering the revenue and royalty sharing program with the
states. Had the provision been in the government’s 2007 fiscal year,
Colorado would have lost about $2.45 million.
Contact Phillip Yates: 384-9117, pyates@postindependent.com
Wednesday co-sponsored an amendment to the federal government’s proposed
2009 budget that would create a “deficit neutral reserve” fund to help
reverse a reduction in payments states receive from federal mineral lease
revenues.
A statement from Salazar’s office said the amendment would create room in
the 2009 budget for Congress to help repeal language that reduces the
current share of revenues states receive from leases for energy and mineral
extraction on federal lands by 2 percent. The reduction means states get 48
percent of the proceeds, and the federal government 52 percent.
The 2 percent reduction measure was inserted into a $555-billion spending
bill late last year at the request of the Bush Administration. Salazar voted
for the bill, while Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., did not.
“Restoring funds that the Bush Administration is attempting to pilfer from
our state is a primary goal of mine,” Salazar said in the statement. “This
is an issue that goes beyond Colorado and impacts several states that depend
on mineral leasing revenues. I have worked and will continue to work to
equalize this split between the state and the federal government, and to
ensure that Colorado receives its fair share of revenue.”
Earlier this year, Salazar, Reps. John Salazar, D-Manassa, and Mark Udall,
D-Eldorado Springs, submitted legislation that would restore the traditional
50-50 split between the federal government and the states from revenue
generated from federal mineral leasing activity.
Steve Wymer, a spokesman for Allard, said the amendment is not necessary and
that the only thing necessary is for the Senate Interior Appropriations
Committee, of which Allard is the ranking Republican member, is to make sure
that revenue split language is not again inserted into the 2009 budget.
“We could use (Salazar’s) support in convincing the (chairwoman) of that,”
Wymer said.
The revenue-split change has raised concerns in places such as Garfield
County, which leads the state in natural gas drilling and relies on mineral
lease revenues to help deal with the impacts.
The revenue-split change that was inserted into the $555-billion
appropriations bill was only for the 2008 fiscal year. However, President
Bush’s budget for the government’s 2009 fiscal year, submitted to Congress
in early February, suggested extending the provision by another year,
something Salazar hopes to prevent.
The 2 percent taken away from states will be used by the Department of
Interior in administering the revenue and royalty sharing program with the
states. Had the provision been in the government’s 2007 fiscal year,
Colorado would have lost about $2.45 million.
Contact Phillip Yates: 384-9117, pyates@postindependent.com
