Colorado River and Sea of Cortez finally embrace after 20 years apart
Ryan Summerlin May 24, 2014
They kissed. Like two long-lost lovers who had been cruelly kept apart for 20 years, the Colorado River and the Sea of Cortez finally embraced. The historic reunion occurred this May as the United States and Mexico worked together to restore the Colorado River Delta.
The “pulse flow” of water raced down from Lake Mead, boiled over Morelos Dam at the border and gently flooded the bone-dry Colorado River Delta. Overhead, a helicopter followed the journey, a photographer recording the historic mingling.
Our messy human concoctions of cities, farms and power plants had drained the river dry, so it took human intervention to return some water to the lower river. If the damming of the Colorado River and draining of the Delta symbolized the failure of the North American environmental movement, this attempt at restoration symbolizes the exact opposite. Yet the job has only just begun, as the pulse flow to bring the Delta to life has ended, and the hard work of buying more water begins.
Our untidy and complicated arrangements are still at work up and down the entire Colorado River. At the very same moment in history when we are working hard to find ways to restore the Delta, almost every state and local agency is determined to drain even more water from the river:
Denver Water is trying to get more water out of the Colorado for the “Moffat Project” and pipe it through the Continental Divide and down into the city.
“Northern Water,” another agency in northern Colorado, is trying to build the “Windy Gap Firming Project” to do the same thing.
The state of Colorado is creating a “Colorado Water Plan” in which the Front Range Water Council, a coalition of agencies from Greeley to Denver to Colorado Springs, has proposed a massive new “Trans Mountain Diversion” from the Colorado River.
Wyoming is considering the same thing, holding meetings and making plans, through a process called the “Wyoming Water Strategy.”
Utah is equally brazen, developing a “State Water Strategy,” and proposing both a massive pipeline out of Lake Powell and a new “Green River Nuclear Power Plant,” each of which would further drain the Colorado River and its tributaries.
And New Mexico, not to be left out, has proposed a “Gila River Pipeline” that would drain more water out of the Gila, nearly ensuring it would never again flow into the Colorado River.
Everyone’s trying to capture the last legally allowed drop. And, of course, climate change has entered the fray with its own agenda, which may topple all of our schemes. Yet I am optimistic.
A few weeks ago, I stood in the Delta and watched the Colorado River crawl toward me through the sand. A small team of us had walked a mile to see the river emerge, and when it happened I was speechless. As the water edged to my toes, it felt cool as it engulfed my feet even though it had traveled miles over 100-degree desert sand. It almost smelled like the snow-capped Colorado mountains that I’d flown over just the day before.
As the Colorado River kissed the Sea of Cortez, I felt it suffuse the environmental community with a sense of hope and passion. Social media of the event quickly came alive with photos and posts that went viral, the mainstream media covered the story for days afterwards, and river lovers felt they’d scored a rare victory.
There’s no denying that environmental advocates are an odd breed. We fight the apocalypse every day and we almost never win, and in the end few of us even expect to. Pessimism becomes a way of life. So whenever a victory is scored, it buoys our hopes. Give us an inch, we’ll run for a mile. Give us a little shot of hope, and we’ll fight for years in the trenches. There’s an amazing amount of work to do to further protect and restore the Colorado River, and there’s an amazing cadre of people lined up to do it.
So if you are involved with Denver Water, or Northern Water, or are part of an organization proposing yet another dam or pipeline, you should consider what you’re up against. You have “plans” and “strategies,” you have sprawling suburbs and Chambers of Commerce demanding more water. You have elected officials spouting off about the need for growth.
What do we have? Hopes, dreams, passions and lawyers, and a river that has once again met its sea. A long-overdue and beautiful reunion — sealed with a kiss.
Gary Wockner is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a column service of High Country News (hcn.org). He coordinates the Save The Colorado River Campaign, which works to protect and restore the Colorado River from the source to the sea. Gary@SaveTheColorado.org
Trending In: Columns
- Helton: Amendment 69 does control health costs (column)
- Catron: Summit County doctor’s top-ten reason to vote no on Amendment 69 (column)
- Liddick: A skeptic’s guide to the Colorado ballot (column)
- Mountain Law: Is it against the law in Colorado to leave a child unattended in a motor vehicle?
- Williams: Vail Resorts vows to take on workforce housing (column)
- Housing Divided, Part 2: Summit’s most vital workers live elsewhere
- Breckenridge town council rebuts claim it reneged on parking garage promise
- Truck stolen from Wildernest winds up on Baldy Road in Breckenridge
- Kelly Samuels: 1969 – 2016
- Best fall hikes for aspen leaves in Summit County (before they’re gone!)