Bull: One man’s ‘principled stance’ is another man’s extortion scheme

Morgan Liddick’s column on Oct. 1 used many words to argue that the Republican game plan, regarding the debt limit, was “principled stance” against a law passed by Congress, signed by the President, and upheld by the Supreme Court. The one word he didn’t flirt with was “extortion,” a criminal act. It is the misuse of the power given to public officer. A “principled stance” is nowhere defined as a legal defense to “extortion” and if it were, Liddick would have mentioned that legal defense.

Jim Bull

Frisco


Stories you may be interested in

The Summit Daily Updated Oct 2, 2013 05:54PM Published Oct 2, 2013 05:54PM Copyright 2013 The Summit Daily. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.