Bull: One man’s ‘principled stance’ is another man’s extortion scheme

Morgan Liddick’s column on Oct. 1 used many words to argue that the Republican game plan, regarding the debt limit, was “principled stance” against a law passed by Congress, signed by the President, and upheld by the Supreme Court. The one word he didn’t flirt with was “extortion,” a criminal act. It is the misuse of the power given to public officer. A “principled stance” is nowhere defined as a legal defense to “extortion” and if it were, Liddick would have mentioned that legal defense.

Jim Bull

Frisco


Explore Related Articles

The Summit Daily Updated Oct 2, 2013 05:54PM Published Oct 2, 2013 05:54PM Copyright 2013 The Summit Daily. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.