A Colorado coal comeback under Trump? | SummitDaily.com

A Colorado coal comeback under Trump?

A dragline stands silhouetted Friday against the white backdrop of winter at Moffat County's Trapper Mine. Some in the coal industry are cautiously optimistic that the changing of the political guard in Washington, D.C., could yield some better news for coal mining communities after years of political and economic setbacks.

CRAIG — The future of Colorado's coal industry is in flux as political power shifts right nationwide. After years of hard knocks, coal-mining communities received a rare piece of good news last week when Gov. John Hickenlooper announced he would not move forward with an executive order to drastically reduce carbon emissions statewide.

However, the week also brought forth a report from the U.S. Department of the Interior on the federal coal program signaling possible hikes in federal royalties, new carbon mitigation requirements and more stringent environmental protections.

All this less than a week from the inauguration of Donald Trump — who has vowed to protect coal miners' jobs — and the future of the industry is looking tentatively more hopeful, if still uncertain.

Northwest Colorado's coal mines have been caught in the political crossfire for several years now, from WildEarth Guardians' 2015 lawsuit against the federal government regarding Colowyo Mine to attempts from both the state and federal government to cut back on carbon emissions.

In a meeting with reporters Tuesday, Hickenlooper explained that his decision to abandon the proposed executive order limiting carbon emissions was due to heavy criticism from Republicans, according to the Associated Press.

"I think the response — the pushback — from the executive order was so intense that the potential benefits were outweighed by the collateral damage," Hickenlooper said. "That being said, I continue to hold it up as a vision."

Recommended Stories For You

The governor shared a draft of the executive order with the public in August, which very much mirrored the proposal set forth in the Environmental Protection Agency's controversial Clean Power Plan. The order would've required a 35 percent reduction in carbon emissions from power producers by 2030 compared to 2012 levels.

"It was the right choice to not go forward with that," said Lee Boughey, senior manager of communications and public affairs for Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc. "As we consider how carbon is addressed, there's a wide range of issues that need to be considered."

Tri-State owns and operates Units 1 and 2 in Craig Station and Colowyo Coal Mine, the power plant's main supplier. The company is Moffat County's No. 1 employer. It recently invested $5 million in a research facility to develop technologies for carbon capture.

Despite the absence of a state mandate, conservation groups are continuing their efforts to push for clean energy.

"All the politics in the world can't change the reality that climate change is real and that we are making climate progress," said WildEarth Guardians Climate and Energy Program Director Jeremy Nichols. "On the business side of things, coal companies are recognizing there are immense liabilities with burning coal and now is the time to start thinking of an exit strategy."

END OF CLEAN POWER PLAN?

As Colorado's governor pursues other means of reducing carbon emissions, the EPA's Clean Power Plan remains stalled in the courts. Twenty-four states joined forces to sue the federal government in 2015 after the plan was announced, and court cases have since rendered a ruling that the EPA must account for job losses associated with new regulatory measures.

What will happen with the Clean Power Plan under the Trump administration remains to be seen, however his pro-coal rhetoric during the campaign has many in the industry feeling hopeful for the first time in years.

"As far as what the ultimate resolution will be, we have no idea what to expect," said Trapper Mine President and General Manager Jim Mattern. "But the things (Trump) said on the campaign trail certainly make me more hopeful for our industry."

The Clean Power Plan, put forth by the Obama administration, sought to cut coal-fired power plants' carbon emissions by 32 percent by 2030 compared with 2005 levels. Tri-State was among those to challenge the rule.

"We maintain our position that the EPA should withdraw the Clean Power Plan, which we believe is unlawful and unworkable," Boughey said in a statement. However, he added, "it is still much too early to make any assumptions regarding changes to the regulations that affect utilities" because of the change in administration.

COAL PROGRAM REVIEW

Though conservationists are aware of Trump's forthright rhetoric on the Clean Power Plan — he wants to get rid of it — they're not daunted in their pursuit of clean energy.

"I'm really skeptical that it's going to lead to some kind of resurgence in the (coal) industry," Nichols said. "They're never going to bounce back to what they were. Transitions are happening that utility companies cannot just reverse."

Despite the massive ideological shift that's about to take place at the White House, the gears were set in motion a year ago by Interior Secretary Sally Jewell to carry out a head-to-toe review of the nation's coal program.

The scoping report released last week drew from hundreds of thousands of comments from various stakeholders. It concludes that modernization of the federal coal program is in fact warranted, given the program hasn't been reviewed since the mid-1980s.

"While energy markets, communities, environmental conditions and national priorities have changed dramatically, the program has remained fairly static in its administration over the last 30 years," the report said.

The federal coal program details stipulations for leasing coal on federal land. Northwest Colorado's coal industry hasn't yet been directly impacted by the review process, which imposed a moratorium on new federal coal leases until the review is complete.

Colowyo has been able to continue the permitting process for an expansion, and already holds eight federal leases.

Trapper Mine currently holds two active federal coal leases and two that have been mined out. Mattern expects the coal reserves under current leases to last at least another 10 years.

POSSIBLE CHANGES

But once the review is complete, changes to the program could affect the mines. Among the main changes the report considers are:

• Increasing royalty rates to ensure Americans are getting a fair return on the leasing of federal lands for coal mining.

• Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions through additional royalties, mitigation or other incentives for coal companies.

• Improving protections for public health and environment.

• Increasing the efficiency of the leasing process.

Mattern disagrees with the proposition that current royalty rates are outdated.

"I think that the coal industry pays its fair share on federal coal," he said. "I think people in the U.S. are getting a good value, at least for what Trapper's paying on our federal royalties."

Likewise, Tri-State opposes any changes that would increase costs.

"As a cooperative, an increase in our electricity generation fuel costs are passed to our members and ultimately to rural electricity consumers," Boughey said in an email.

The review will culminate in draft and final programmatic environmental impact statements expected to be complete by early 2019.