Colorado enviros pushing water conservation
DENVER – The state demographer’s office predicts Colorado’s population will double to about 8 million by 2050. And that has huge implications for water use in the arid Centennial State.Statewide environmental groups are working with legislators this year to lay the groundwork for water conservation measures that will make the best use of a scarce resource.”People really understand the importance of conservation,” said Summit County native Becky Long, who works for Colorado Environmental Coalition, a statewide advocacy group. “Every drop of water you take out of a river is one you’ll never see again. Water is one of our most precious resources, and it needs to be part of the road map as we’re planning for the state’s future growth.”Among a package of state water conservation bills is a measure to continue Colorado’s existing water-efficiency grant program, which was set to expire in 2012. The program provides financial assistance to communities, water providers and other agencies for water conservation activities and projects.”This helps a lot of our West Slope municipalities to get funding for particular projects,” said Shanna Koenig, who tracks water issues for local governments in Summit County and other Western Slope communities. “We are supportive of any way we can conserve water better in the state. And the more water conservation that is done on the East Slope will potentially lead to less water being moved from the West Slope.”If passed, the bill would provide up to $550,000 per year for water conservation and efficiency projects through 2020.Conservationists are also working to create a reporting system whereby large water suppliers, like Denver Water, would gather and publish data annually on water use, number of users, conservation efforts and efficiency projects.”We don’t really have the data to tell us what’s coming out of these conservation efforts like we do on other issues,” Long said. “The goal of the bill is to get that snapshot of information each year so we can plan better.”Summit County Commissioner Karn Stiegelmeier said she is supportive of more robust water conservation efforts and plans to keep an eye on the bills as they make their way through the state Legislature.”I think water is the most critical resource in Colorado, so it makes sense for environmental groups to work collaboratively for good conservation measures throughout the state,” Stiegelmeier said. “Most people here are aware that a lot of our water goes to the East, and people get extremely annoyed when they see Kentucky bluegrass and sprinklers sending water out into the streets.”Working harder on the usage side is a better policy, she said.”It just makes sense for conservation measures to be in place before any additional diversions from the West Slope to the East Slope,” Stiegelmeier added.Julie Sutor can be reached at (970) 668-4630 or firstname.lastname@example.org efficiency grant bill is pretty much an extension’ the program has been very helpful, the program is necessary, esp on western slope, small utilities need funds to put their conservation plans in place; as well technical assistance, the teacher and the grader they’re the ones who must approve the water conservation plan; help understand what needs are, what options are; wegp helps w development and implmentationdata reporting bill, has some problems, there is a tech correction, there is still soem concern, the river dist is sup[orting the bill in conceto, collecting comparable data on water conservation and use statewide is worthwhile; the data they are requiring, lends itelsef to interpretation and manipulation; i think some of those data are approp, some quality control and quality assurance on data themselvesscheduled for hearing next week; very similar to bill john salazar carried in 2004; we thin,k it is a fair and reasonable bill that allows for flexibility to address the kinds of impacts from; impacts ; at its core recogniction that water is valuable across the state, it has diferent values across the state, has value for region’s econ future; i find it ironic dw is opposing this, dw has been a leader in mitigation project impacts, this bill rewqards working w local comunityites, doesn’t require it, they can go to water court; you’ve got to figure out at least what the imacts are; to make proj benefical to area water is coming from as well as area water is going totreese
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.
Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User