Energy Department will do Hanford environmental assessment | SummitDaily.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Energy Department will do Hanford environmental assessment

YAKIMA, Wash. ” In an abrupt reversal, the federal government has agreed to begin assessing the damage to natural resources caused by plutonium production at the Hanford nuclear reservation, the nation’s most contaminated nuclear site.

Such assessments typically cost millions of dollars and often serve as a precursor to paying monetary damages.

In 2002, the Yakama Nation sued the U.S. Department of Energy, which manages Hanford cleanup, seeking restoration of soil, water, plant and animal life that may have been injured by radioactive waste and other hazardous substances. The Nez Perce and Umatilla tribes later joined the lawsuit, as did Washington and Oregon.

The Energy Department fought back, arguing it was too soon to determine if there were injuries to the environment or whether reparations should be paid.

But the department said Tuesday it would begin assessing those damages in collaboration with two other federal agencies, the states and the Indian tribes.

“The only change was how much we’re willing to do when,” Keith Klein, manager of the Energy Department’s Richland Operations office, told The Associated Press. “We’re willing to do more, sooner, now, because we believe we’ve found ways to do it that won’t impact our cleanup obligations and schedules or add unduly to the taxpayer cost.”

The federal government created Hanford in the 1940s as part of the top-secret Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb. Today, it is the nation’s most contaminated nuclear site, with cleanup costs expected to top $50 billion.

Among other things, the Yakamas alleged that contamination of the nearby Columbia River contributed to declining Northwest salmon populations in the past 50 years.

A federal judge ordered the two sides into mediation in 2004 to try to resolve the dispute. At that time, Washington and Oregon tried to join the talks, but the Energy Department refused.

The two states and the additional tribes then joined the lawsuit to compel the federal government to perform the review.

Klein said the department’s new stance was not a result of the litigation.

“Typically, these are things that are dealt with after the cleanup has been completed,” he said. “The fact that we’re dealing with it now I think is evidence that people are starting to see an end to the cleanup.

“It’s dealing with the cleanup with the end in mind,” he said.

The new review will be integrated into the Energy Department’s ongoing cleanup actions at Hanford, Klein said. The department also expects to carry out both the assessment and cleanup activities under its existing budget.

The Yakamas have estimated a full review of natural resource damages could cost as much as $100 million.

Tribal officials said they were cautiously optimistic about the announcement.

“The test will be what DOE actually does. IF DOE fully funds the effort and works with the Yakama Nation, other tribes, states and federal agencies in an open, cooperative way, it will be good,” Philip “Bing” Olney, chairman of the tribe’s radioactive hazardous waste committee, said in a statement. “But if DOE and its contractors choose to do a secretive, so-so job, like so often has happened at Hanford, then there will be more trouble. Only time will tell.”

The states believe an assessment will ultimately save money, result in better cleanup decisions, avoid the potential of having to perform cleanup twice and lead to better restoration of natural resources sooner, said Polly Zehm, deputy director for the Washington state Department of Ecology.

Ken Niles, assistant director for the Oregon Department of Energy, also called the federal government’s announcement welcome news. But he said it was too soon to know if the Energy Department’s plans would meet the demands of the states and the tribes.

“Our reaction is a little bit optimistic, but still tempered a little bit, waiting to see details,” Niles said. “The best case will mean they satisfy what we were looking for and the litigation will be dropped. It’s way too early to say that’s what will happen.”


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User