Hillman says his goal in Referendum A is saving agriculture water | SummitDaily.com

Hillman says his goal in Referendum A is saving agriculture water

First, I want to thank you for your willingness to use my commentary pieces when you find them useful and relevant and for your willingness to “agree to disagree” in some cases.

Second, if my commentary on Referendum A ($2 billon water bonding authority, SDN, Sept. 3) didn’t succeed in making the point that my first concern is the ongoing “drying up” of agricultural lands on the Eastern Plains – certainly caused by Front Range growth – then I missed my mark.

While Front Range growth has its costs and benefits, its consumption of agricultural water is definitely a cost and certainly a more serious concern for me than simply storing water for lawns in Highlands Ranch.

In any case, I hope to stop by to say “hello” next time I’m through Summit County, which seems to happen fairly frequently.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User