Internet organ transplant a success |

Internet organ transplant a success

AP Photo/Ed AndrieskiKidney patient Bob Hickey, left, of Edwards, Colo., and donor Rob Smitty, of Chattanooga, Tenn., received word at their Denver hotel on Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2004, that Hickey's transplant would take place on Wednesday. It was originally scheduled for Monday but postponed because of ethical considerations. Hickey and Smitty arranged the transplant over the internet.

DENVER – A man who had waited for a new kidney for five years underwent surgery Wednesday in what was believed to be the first transplant brokered through a commercial Web site – a transaction that has raised a host of ethical and legal questions.Presbyterian/St. Luke’s Medical Center spokeswoman Stephanie Lewis said both donor and recipient were doing well after surgery that lastedEdwards resident Bob Hickey had needed a transplant since 1999 because of kidney disease but had grown tired of being on the national waiting list. He met donor Rob Smitty of Chattanooga, Tenn., through, a Web site created in January to match donors and patients for a fee.”Sitting on a waiting list and hoping for a new kidney for so long, your attention is attracted to anything that might help you,” Hickey, a 58-year-old former executive at a health maintenance organization, said a few hours before the operation.The transplant had been scheduled for Monday, but doctors called it off at the last moment to look into whether either Hickey or Smitty stood to profit from the arrangement. Both men said no money changed hands for the organ, which would violate federal law.Ethicists said they still have serious concerns about and other organ donations between strangers.

There are no laws against soliciting an organ donation, and an increasing number of patients have turned to friends and family, or even casual acquaintances, for kidneys and pieces of liver.By finding his own donor, Hickey bypassed the waiting list maintained by the United Network for Organ Sharing, the nonprofit group that works under government contract to allocate all organs donated from the dead. It doles out organs, in part, according to which patients need them the most.The network does not oversee the increasing number of live donors, such as Smitty. Last year, there were 6,920 living donors compared with 6,457 dead ones.University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Arthur Caplan said the first ethical issue raised by Internet donations is financial: Not everyone can afford to pay’s fees or donor expenses.”Those who are better off are going to have access to people as potential donors that the poor or the shy won’t have,” he said.Caplan also said the Web site did not highlight potential hazards for donors. “Their job is to make these matches happen,” he said. “They’re not in the business of trying to discourage anyone or warn them.”, based in Canton, Mass., charges varying fees to post profiles of people looking for live organ donors. The company says all its profits go to maintain the site, and they have no problem waiving their fees.”If people can’t afford it, we get them on it anyway,” said Dr. Jeremiah Lowney, the medical director for and a specialist in internal medicine.Hickey paid the site $295 per month for three months. He is also expected to pick up about $5,000 in transportation costs and other expenses incurred by Smitty. Within three months of posting his profile on the Web site, he received 500 offers for donations.UNOS came out against in June, saying it “exploits vulnerable populations and subverts the equitable allocation of organs for transplantation.” UNOS spokesman Joel Newman said the network is concerned when anyone puts his or her need for an organ above others.”An organ that becomes available with certain medical characteristics should be offered equally to the people that could benefit from it,” he said.

Typically, transplant patients find living donors on their own. Most living donors, though, are family, friends and others who have a personal connection to the patient.Strangers have occasionally met over the Internet, but the Web site is the first to systematically try to match donors and patients online.Federal law prohibits the sale of organs, but it does allow payment for living donors’ expenses, such as time lost from work or airfare to the hospital.The Colorado hospital went ahead with the operation after granting what it called a “compassionate exception.”But Mimi Roberson, the hospital’s chief executive, insisted that the granting of an exception is not to be construed as an endorsement of and said officials will give greater scrutiny to such arrangements in the future.”They’re allowing me to do something just good for this man,” Smitty, a part-time photographer and food distributor, said before the operation. “Maybe they went and found out I don’t have a million dollars in the bank somewhere. I feel grateful, privileged to be wearing the shoes I am.”

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User