On mine cleanup, Superfund idea divides residents | SummitDaily.com

On mine cleanup, Superfund idea divides residents

DENVER — Southwestern Colorado residents told Congress on Thursday that the Gold King Mine blowout and other mines spilling acid waste into waterways could cause serious long-term damage to their tourism economy, but they disagreed on whether a federal Superfund designation would help or hurt.

A rafting company owner, a county commissioner and a chamber of commerce official told the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee that they don’t yet know the full economic impact of the spill, but it has been devastating so far, scaring away visitors and triggering layoffs at travel-related businesses.

An Environmental Protection Agency-led cleanup crew inadvertently triggered the release of 3 million gallons of tainted wastewater from the inactive Gold King Mine north of Silverton on Aug. 5. The water turned the Animas River a mustard-yellow color as it flowed through Durango, Colorado, eventually reaching New Mexico and Utah.

La Plata County Commissioner Bradford Blake said outdoor recreation companies, farms, greenhouses and other businesses that rely on the river and its water suffered immediate losses ranging from $8,600 to $100,000 each. “Clearly, we do not know yet what the long-term impact of the Gold King spill, and the publicity generated by it, might be.”

Andy Corra, who owns a sporting goods store and rafting company in Durango, said 2015 had been a good year for him before the spill.

“And then — boom! The river was closed,” he said. “We didn’t have any time to plan. We didn’t have any time to adjust.”

He called the Animas the lifeblood of the region and said it will take a massive effort to clean up the scores of inactive mines spilling millions of gallons of waste into the watershed year-round.

He said an EPA designation as a Superfund site is the only obvious solution. Superfund status would make the area eligible for extensive federal funds for a comprehensive cleanup. Other proposals — such as reforming the 1872 mining act and a law that would encourage third-party volunteer groups to clean up abandoned mines — are good steps but don’t go far enough, he said.

DeAnne Gallegos, executive director of the Silverton Chamber of Commerce, said Superfund designation carries a stigma that can discourage tourism and investment. “Is it the magic bullet? I don’t know.”

She also expressed doubts about the EPA, saying Silverton residents had to fight to get the agency to hold a community meeting about the spill.

The EPA has long been interested in a Superfund designation, but it encountered local opposition. Agency officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.

Republican Rep. Scott Tipton, whose district includes Silverton and Durango, warned against a Superfund designation and said other options should be considered. “Superfund status does bring with it a stigma, and right or wrong, often that perception is reality,” he told the committee.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User