Rich Colo. school districts could see cuts | SummitDaily.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Rich Colo. school districts could see cuts

DENVER – Some Colorado public school districts face teacher layoffs and school closures next year, anticipating a 6.4 percent cut in state education funding. The situation isn’t as dire for a handful of property-rich school districts, but lawmakers may force them anyway to make comparable cuts in the name of fairness.

Colorado’s public schools are paid for by state funds and local property taxes. For the fiscal year that starts July 1, total school funding is to drop from $5.6 billion this year to $5.45 billion – even though – formulas used to calculate the annual increases required by Amendment 23 would normally set next year’s figure at $5.8 billion.

While tax revenues are expected to increase next year, lawmakers need to cover $1.3 billion in total state spending over two years as federal stimulus money and other sources of one-time money dry up. Education funding is in play because it accounts for about 40 percent of the state’s $18 billion budget.

Under a strict reading of the law, basic per-pupil funding next year is set to rise by 0.4 percent since inflation is negative this year, providing three-quarters of total public schools funding. But the remainder will be reduced by $365 million.

To spread the pain, officials proposed calculating 6.4 percent of the total amount Colorado’s 178 school districts are set to receive – state plus local money – and then reduce their state aid by that amount.

For seven districts, however, there isn’t enough state aid to take that 6.4 percent from. Those districts – Clear Creek, West Grand, Gunnison, Estes Park, Park, Aspen and Summit – rely more on local property taxes than the state, mainly because their property values are higher and because local voters authorized higher taxes for schools.

The House voted to reduce whatever state aid those districts got and temporarily limit the amount of property taxes they could raise and spend on schools. Together those districts would be forced to spend $3.1 million less than they can now. The Senate thought it was unfair to deny those districts local tax dollars but did vote to cut their limited state aid.

One proposed compromise would have required the seven districts to spend $1.9 million of local tax dollars to cover expenses normally picked up for the state, such as transportation, and let them keep the other $1.2 million. The $1.9 million the state keeps would be distributed to all districts – including the rich ones – for transportation. Only two districts would take the full 6.4 percent hit under that plan – Estes Park and Gunnison.

It failed when Sen. Pat Steadman, D-Denver, first introduced it in the Senate. Sen. Scott Renfroe, R-Greeley, called it the “Robin Hood amendment.”

Steadman argued all districts should share the burden because the state constitution requires a “thorough and uniform” system of schools.


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User