Senate Bill 62: Water, tourism and our recreation future |

Senate Bill 62: Water, tourism and our recreation future

Kent VertreesSteamboat Springs

Water is the most defining character as to how we as a culture, living here in Colorado, will prosper into the future.Today, our tourist-based economy is driving Colorado’s future, and as the debate over recreational water rights continues to escalate, we must realize how important these rights are for our local economies and the future of Colorado.River-based recreation is a cornerstone to this tourism success and making sure that we have reasonable flows left in our rivers for kayaking, rafting, tubing and fishing will provide for our future inheritance.Senate Bill 62’s inability to recognize this with its one-size-fits-all flow regime of 350 cubic-feet-per-second is doing us no favors.Every river, stream and creek where Recreational In-Channel Diversion (RICD) flows are needed should be viewed independently from one another.These flows should be a percentage of historic flow and provide for a reasonable recreation experience that is realistic and can support a viable recreation and tourist-based economy.For example, the city of Steamboat Springs is applying for 1,700 cfs at peak flow on the Yampa River; this is approximately 40 percent of the historic hydrographic flow and is certainly not greedy.It is realistic that 1,700 cfs will help sustain a healthy river which our local economy depends on through river related recreation and our local tourism opportunities.Sponsor Sen. Jack Taylor fears that future upstream growth and water storage will be affected by these RICD flows. Here in the Yampa Valley and other river basins in the state, upstream municipalities, existing agricultural and industrial interests have more than adequate water rights and potential for water exchanges.So the issue in trying to limit an RICD to 350 cfs at a maximum must be one of storage, but storage for whom?Could the actual intent of SB-62 be the protection of unlimited transbasin diversions for Front Range development?Those interests consistently challenge RICD applications in Colorado District and Supreme Courts, and it’s those interests who will benefit the most by putting a one-size fits all cap on RICD flows.Over the next 25 years, Colorado’s population is projected to grow by at least 2.8 million people. The majority of these folks will be living in the Front Range where current water supplies will not adequately satisfy such thirst.So, where will the water come from? The Yampa River, Colorado River, Gunnison River and other Western Slope rivers, streams and creeks are going to supply this water.Let’s face it, additional storage is necessary and water will be needed to fill these reservoirs and provide for transbasin diversions.Certain West Slope rivers will be depleted, and your home river, including mine, the Yampa River, may cease to be the rivers we know and love.But, let’s first and foremost allow for water to remain in our rivers to support the tourism and river-based recreation necessary for our future.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User