Ski area planning streamlined |

Ski area planning streamlined

SUMMIT COUNTY – A move by the Forest Service to cut red tape means ski resorts will do master planning without formal public input.Most of the existing ski area master plans were completed under the stringent requirements of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), that requires extensive public involvement and a “hard look” at alternatives.Ski area master plans are long-range conceptual documents that outline future ski area development. In-depth site-specific reviews for lifts, snowmaking or an on-mountain restaurant proposed within a three to five year timeframe would still be required, said Ed Ryberg, who recently retired from his post as winter sports administrator with the agency’s Rocky Mountain region.Ryberg said most of Colorado’s ski areas are currently updating their master plans. Dillon District Ranger Rick Newton said that process is also in the early stages at local ski areas, including Arapahoe Basin, where the Forest Service is developing an Environmental Impact Statement to analyze several amendments to the area’s master plan, including a proposal for a new lift in Montezuma Bowl.All four Aspen areas, and the resorts Eagle County, are working on their plans, Ryberg said. Steamboat just completed an update, while Crested Butte and Durango Mountain Resort have also proposed changes, according to Ryberg. In the past five years, Colorado resorts have added about 2,300 acres of new terrain, Ryberg said.Cutting the intensive up-front review is intended to alleviate regulatory gridlock, Ryberg said, describing a multi-layered process that can end up being a “massive waste of time and money.” In some previous cases, the agency and resorts devoted considerable resources to the required studies, but by the time they’re done, market conditions or other external factors change, and some elements of those master plans are never implemented.One example is the long-running environmental study for new lifts, trails and snowmaking at Copper Mountain. Although a decision on that proposal is expected soon, a senior Intrawest official recently characterized the study as an antiquated document.But the move away from public involvement in ski area master planning could be controversial, as watchdog groups have criticized resort expansions for chipping away at important wildlife habitat. On the White River National Forest, natural resource impacts related to ski resorts exceeded those of any other human activity during recent years, the EPA said when it commented on the forests recent plan revision. The push toward streamlining environmental reviews is of general concern to Colorado Wilds Rocky Smith. It raises the question of just how much ski areas will continue to grow, and whether that growth is warranted in the context of skier visit trends.The 2002 White River National Forest plan revision anticipated significant growth in skier numbers at Summit County resorts. About 6,000 acres of new terrain were allocated to ski areas in Summit and Eagle counties another reason for the Forest Service to look at master plan updates, Ryberg said, adding that some of the areas are operating under 20-year-old plans. I think Breckenridges plan goes back to 1985 or 86, Ryberg said. Theyve really been piecemealing on to that for quite a while.A test caseSteamboat was one of the first areas to complete a master plan update under the new process.Its too early to say streamlined, at least in our case, said Chris Diamond, president of the Steamboat Ski and Resort Corporation. The jury is still out as to whether it will help us. But I think theres the expectation of a certain amount of collaboration, Diamond said. I think it puts us on firm moral ground as far as getting projects approved, Diamond said. It makes it harder for someone to come in at a late stage and be difficult just for the sake of being difficult.Diamond said that, even without the public scrutiny required by federal environmental laws, the ski area worked to garner extensive input from the community. We paraded that draft plan out there to everyone. Season pass holders, local governments, employees; we did the Rotary Club thing, Diamond said. Ryberg said Steamboats public outreach effort was exemplary and a critical element of the master planning process.The guys in Summit County are not as open about getting things out on the table, Ryberg said. He added that if ski areas involve the public up front like Steamboat did even if its not a formal NEPA process then the Forest Service has a level of comfort with approving the plan.Bob Berwyn can be reached at (970) 331-5996, or at

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User