White River Plan costing about $7.5 million
GLENWOOD SPRINGS – The federal government spent about $7.5 million to update the management plan for the national forest that comprises about 80 percent of Summit County.The White River National Forest Plan took about seven years to complete and is just coming to a close. It determines how the forest will be managed for the next 15 years.Forest planners had to digest about 14,000 letters and e-mails from concerned citizens, companies and special interest groups invested in how the most visited national forest in the country is used.They also had to rework some alternatives in response to comments by U.S. Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Grand Junction, who objected to the protectionism bent the plan was taking.After the plan was released in June 2002, it faced appeals from every direction – from Vail Resorts, to a coalition of environmental groups headed by the Aspen-based Wilderness Workshop to a national lobbying organization for off-road vehicle riders. The Forest Service recently ruled on those appeals and is implementing their findings.All that analysis takes time and money, said John Rupe, a regional planning analyst for the regional forester’s office in Denver. He said the major cost of preparing a forest plan is personnel, which runs at about $100,000 per month.”It costs about $1 million to $1.2 million per year (to produce a plan) in our experiences in the Rocky Mountain Region,” Rupe said.That type of time-consuming and costly process is at the center of the latest fight between the Bush administration and environmentalists. The administration announced last week it would simplify and streamline those planning processes.The Forest Service claims the changes will allow it to create more flexible forest plans in a shorter time and smaller cost.The agency’s Washington, D.C., headquarters said in a news release that forest plan revisions will take two to three years rather than five to seven. Under the new rules, the revised forest plans will be evaluated every five years to make sure goals and objectives are being met.The Forest Service believes it can cut costs for forest plans by as much as 30 percent under the new rules.The new rules also will give regional foresters more flexibility to rule on logging, mining and oil and gas drilling proposals with studies that are less detailed than were required in the past.Environmental groups criticized the new rules with allegations that they will undermine environmental protections and limit the chance for meaningful participation by citizens in local forest planning issues.The freshly inked White River National Forest Plan will still guide everything from where logging will be allowed to where roadless areas will be maintained, and from where snowmobilers will be allowed to play to where new wilderness areas will be established. But the new regulations give foresters more flexibility when ruling on specific projects that arise, according to the Forest Service’s headquarters.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.
Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User