Writers on the Range: What Wallace Stegner taught us about the rise of myths | SummitDaily.com

Writers on the Range: What Wallace Stegner taught us about the rise of myths

Michelle Nijhuis
Writers on the Range

I’ve come to think of the writer Wallace Stegner (1909-1993) as a brilliant, beloved, occasionally exasperating uncle. He said many things first and best, and, though he could get stuffy at times, he’s still mostly right about the West and our penchant for mythmaking.

Recently, I ran across “Joe Hill,” Stegner’s 1950 “fictional biography” of the legendary labor organizer. Most of the Stegner I’ve read is Late Stegner: eloquent, aphoristic about the failings and promise of the West. “Joe Hill” is Middle Stegner, published when the author was in his early 40s: rougher, more tentative in both style and ideas, but at least as interesting as any Stegner I know.

Countless writers and musicians have told, and sung, the legend of Joe Hill. Swedish-born itinerant laborer, songwriter for the Industrial Workers of the World, and, finally, martyr, Hill was killed by state firing squad after a controversial murder conviction in Salt Lake City in 1915. “Don’t waste any time in mourning,” he wrote to I.W.W. leader Bill Haywood. “Organize.”

And so the man became an enduring myth.

Stegner, who grew up partly in Salt Lake, knew the legend. As a young man, he dated the daughter of the warden of the prison where Hill was held. When he began researching his book, he expected to find that the real Joe Hill was the victim of a frame-up. After reading as many documents as he could find and tracking down people who had met Hill, Stegner concluded that the Utah courts convicted the organizer on flimsy evidence, and killed him unjustly. But he also believed that Hill might well have participated in the armed robbery he was accused of, which killed two men, and then turned his case into a rallying cry for the cause he loved.

“Joe Hill” doesn’t convict Joe Hill, but it allows, even encourages, the reader to do so. It portrays Hill as a complex, not always likable man: talented, passionate, sporadically violent, far from the Christ-like image seen on union posters. Some critics say Hill resembles Stegner’s father, a cold drifter always on the losing end of the Western boom.

Stegner knew the West and its people were complicated, and demolishing myths was his business. Fictionalizing a real historical character is tricky, both artistically and ethically, but with so few facts at hand, Stegner felt fiction was the only way to examine the legend.

“I contented myself with trying to make him a man, such a man as he might have been,” writes Stegner in the book’s introduction, “with his legend at his feet like a lengthening shadow.”

“Joe Hill” received little notice, sold poorly, and put Stegner off novel writing for more than a decade. But it continues to be read, and it continues to complicate the received wisdom about both Hill and Stegner.

In one of his final interviews, Stegner reflected on his decision to fictionalize Hill. “I think probably any living person, any person with living relatives who can be hurt, should be exempt from that kind of invention,” he told professor Robert Keller.

Which brings me to a man Joe Hill – mythical, fictional or actual – surely would have despised: the 26-year-old billionaire Mark Zuckerberg. “The Social Network,” the triple-Oscar-winning movie about Zuckerberg’s founding of Facebook, is, like “Joe Hill,” a smart, highly entertaining and partly fictional biography. But where “Joe Hill” used a historical skeleton to build a plausible alternative to a longstanding legend, “The Social Network” deliberately departs from known facts – in effect, constructing a myth about a living person.

Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin, who never met Zuckerberg, created “Mark Zuckerberg,” a character who dresses and sometimes acts like the real Zuckerberg, but “I don’t want my fidelity to be to the truth; I want it to be to storytelling,” Sorkin told an interviewer. “I feel like, had I met Mark, I would have felt a certain obligation to make the character sound like Mark, walk like Mark, all of those things. And frankly, I probably would have had an affection for him that I wouldn’t have wanted to betray.”

Maybe we’re savvy enough as a society to assume that all movies, even those about living people, are fiction, but I doubt it. A seductive narrative can stick with us for generations, even when we know the truth.

Zuckerberg doesn’t need me or anyone else to shed tears for him. But as we who live in the West know, and as Stegner knew far better than most, myths can be persistent and pernicious. We don’t need to build them.

Michelle Nijhuis is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News (hcn.org) in Paonia, Colorado, where she is a contributing editor.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User