Gulliford: Wolves belong back home in Colorado (column) |

Gulliford: Wolves belong back home in Colorado (column)

Andrew Gulliford
Writers on the Range

In January, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission voted not to allow the re-introduction of wolves back into the state.

That’s too bad because wolves are coming. They may already be here.

You don’t think so? Then why is there a wolf-sighting form on the wildlife commission’s website, and why do so many Coloradans claim to have seen Canis lupus in the high country?

Theories on how top-tier predators are crucial in ordering and stabilizing landscapes have now been proven. To understand the potential for wolves in Colorado, we can study lessons learned from two decades of wolf recovery in Yellowstone National Park.

I teach my college students that wolves brought butterflies back to Yellowstone. I explain that wolves cut the coyote population in half. With fewer coyotes, there are more small rodents and mammals aerating the soil and providing better grasses and flowers. But the largest and most dramatic effect has been culling the Yellowstone elk herd.

By 1995, the ungulates had done severe damage to the park. Wolves changed that. As wolf packs began to hunt elk, the wapiti were slowed and caught in downed timber along rivers and streams. So elk learned safety meant higher sagebrush benches where they could see and smell better. With fewer elk, plants recovered. Aspen thrived. And in this new thicker forest of riverine vegetation, beaver colonies established small pools, attracting other animals, insects and, yes, butterflies. The human dynamic changed, too. Thousands of wolf watchers at Yellowstone National Park add $35 million annually to the area’s economy.

So who’s afraid of the big, bad wolf? Hunters who see fewer elk, ranchers worried about their cattle and sheep men forced to adopt new herding techniques.

I’m a big-game hunter. Why would I promote more competition for the cow elk I like to shoot? Because I believe in intact ecosystems. I believe hard science trumps superstition and false facts.

It’s been over a decade since the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission convened its Wolf Working Group. It’s time for a new working group to convene and for wolf education sessions to start as well. The latter were a goal in the group’s original report but they have never taken place.

Would wolves change Colorado ecosystems? Yes — but first, they have to get here, and that’s anything but easy. Wolves would have to cross the Red Desert of Wyoming and Rio Blanco and Moffat counties where many ranchers carry rifles in their pickups. A biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service told me that wolves are coming, but “there’s all those guns between us and the Wyoming wolf packs.”

That’s why official re-introduction is important. In the Mount Zirkel, Maroon Bells, Raggeds or South San Juan wildernesses, we only need a breeding pair. Just two wolves. A young male and female with amorous intent.

In June 2004, a wolf died along Interstate 70 after being hit by a car. Five years later, in 2009, a GPS-collared wolf traveled 3,000 miles before dying from a banned poison in Rio Blanco County. In April 2015, a coyote hunter accidentally killed a gray wolf near Kremmling, 100 miles west of Denver.

Wolves are coming, slowly. Colorado Parks and Wildlife even has a 10-year-old plan, “Findings and Recommendations for Managing Wolves that Migrate into Colorado.” Strategies involve adaptive management and damage payments for livestock killed. What’s more, “Migrating wolves should be allowed to live with no boundaries where they find habitat,” and “Wolf distribution in Colorado will ultimately be defined by the interplay between ecological needs and social tolerance.” Once here, state wildlife staff “will implement programs to make sure that wolves are included as a part of wildlife heritage.”

If wolves are returning, why not also re-introduce them and boost genetic diversity? Yet in 1982, 1989 and again last month, the state’s Wildlife Commission voted to oppose “the intentional release of any wolves into Colorado.” That decision is regrettable.

If wolves arrive on their own, we’ll have to live with where they appear. If wolves are introduced, there can be more flexibility on where they live and more planned ecological impacts. Wolf re-introduction first requires a positive vote from the Colorado State Wildlife Commission. A second affirmative vote must come from the Colorado State Legislature. When I tell my college students that wolves are coming home to Colorado, I always add that I hope I’ll be around to see them take hold. We need them back.

Andrew Gulliford is a contributor to Writers on the Range, an opinion service of High Country News ( He is professor of history and Environmental Studies at Fort Lewis College. He can be reached at

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Summit Daily is embarking on a multiyear project to digitize its archives going back to 1989 and make them available to the public in partnership with the Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. The full project is expected to cost about $165,000. All donations made in 2023 will go directly toward this project.

Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.