Liddick: Brokering the next GOP nominee (column)
December 15, 2015
"Brokered Convention." Two words to fill the hearts of every Trumpologist and Carsonite with trepidation and fury at the impending betrayal of the people's will and to freeze the rest of the hearts on the conservative and Republican side of the aisle with concern over third parties.
Both reactions reflect how little most people know about our history and political terms. In most basic form a "brokered convention" means no single candidate arrives with the necessary number of delegates to win nomination on the first vote. Since most delegates are pledged to cast only the first vote for their indicated candidate, a good deal of horse trading will then go on as each strives to collect the votes necessary to put them past the finish line in subsequent balloting.
Before 1936, most conventions in US history were "brokered"; it was only as the party primary began to gain ground that the practice became rarer. But "brokered" did not necessarily mean bad. Such conventions gave us Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt. Nor did the practice disappear.
Brokered conventions included the Democrats' nomination of Adlai Stephenson in 1952 and Republicans' selection of Thomas Dewey in 1948. Other recent conventions in which the candidate with the most delegates did not have the votes needed to win outright at the beginning of the festivities include the Republicans in 1976 and the Democrats in 1984.
2008 is a special case for Democrats: Two state delegations were penalized by the party for early voting, changing the dynamics of the delegate count. "Superdelegates," who represented the interests of the party and were not elected in primaries, fell more to Barack Obama than Hillary Clinton over the spring, so, by June, he was the presumptive nominee. DNC chairman Howard Dean was instrumental in this process, so although the convention was not itself "brokered," the process leading up to it saw heavy involvement by party leaders.
What is now playing out among Republicans is 2008 on steroids. Rather than pledging themselves to respect the will of their voters, party apparatchiks, insiders and even a slice of the political class that seems to have more in common with its Democrat opponents than with Republican candidates supported by average Americans have declared war on some seeking their party's nomination. Their animus seems to spring from personal, visceral anger at those who challenge the status quo or threaten the cozy elitism of Olympus on the Potomac. This hardly inspires confidence that candidates whose appeal extends beyond the Washington, D.C. echo chamber and its population of back-slapping old boys and favor traders will receive fair dealing; in fact, the backstabbing and mud-slinging has already begun, courtesy of those who clearly believe the peasants have not tugged their forelocks sufficiently. When one realizes that Republican "superdelegates" are members of the party elite in each state, one is reminded of the last act of a Shakespearean tragedy: Know that by the end, there will be blood and nobody will be whole.
Recommended Stories For You
This matters, because Ben Carson is not a conservative's – or even a Republican's – principal political foe. Nor is Ted Cruz nor Carly Fiorina. Not even Donald Trump, as wild and crazy as he can be, is that. The one who must be defeated is Hillary Clinton and the loopy economics, the incompetence, the weakness, the self-enrichment, lying, disdain and elitism and paranoia for which she stands. She, and all who sail with her under the black flag of unconditional war against the foundations of the Republic must be put decisively aside, which cannot be done by a party riven with conflict. Two words should suffice as a warning: Ross Perot. Remember him, and what he wrought?
To address this potential problem, Republican leadership should stop cursing and spitting when they speak the names of they who might become the party's nominee. Particularly when they are so blind and tone-deaf to the alchemy that lies behind their success. They ought as well to caution everyone, including their own favorites, that politics is unpredictable, and things might not go their way; that no one should say anything so vile it cannot be taken back and so damaging that it precludes victory in November. They should begin early to bring all candidates' representatives into the convention process, so that it is not only aboveboard, but is seen to be so by all.
Because victory in 2016 is bigger than personal pique. More important than ego. Larger than one's rhetorical preferences or taste or style. It's about the future of the Republic. So our political class owes it to each of us, and to the country, to act as though they think it is.
And, in the words of the old Nat "King" Cole tune, to "Straighten Up and Fly Right."
Morgan Liddick writes a weekly column for the Summit Daily.
Trending In: Columns
- Mountain Law: Is it against the law in Colorado to leave a child unattended in a motor vehicle?
- Mountain Law: Colorado HOAs can now restrict short-term rentals (column)
- Mountain Law: Lis pendens: Legalese you should know before purchasing property
- Mountain Law: What is a ‘Rule 408’ discussion? (column)
- Pheil: Using NNTO in the subject line of an email
- Breckenridge Town Council set to ban Segways after Aspen business inquires about expansion
- Arapahoe Basin Ski Area begins snowmaking Friday, the earliest start in a decade
- Vote to save the Tabor. Leadville’s iconic Tabor Opera House the only Colorado site selected for national preservation campaign
- Opinion | Liddick: Democrats show deep hypocrisy in Kavanaugh confirmation
- Local businesses raise $8,000 to wipe out Summit School District elementary school lunch debt