Giller-Leinwohl: Time for a mountain biking lobby (letter)
Time for a mountain biking lobby
First, I would like to commend the Aspen Times and Summit Daily for the article “Area cyclists opposed to national group’s push for bikes in wilderness.” This is a complex issue with important ramifications, and I’d like to add a couple points.
The article alludes to a theoretical lift on the wilderness biking ban around Aspen. I don’t think the Sustainable Trails Coalition (STC) would ever intend to lobby for biking in high-visitation wilderness areas. Its aim is more to push for considerations made for mountain bikers (as with other user groups) within wilderness areas, not an access free-for-all.
Several studies have shown that horses impact trails more than bikers or hikers, can eat sensitive plants and spread invasive plant species. Other wilderness area recreational activities require a ‘mechanical advantage’ (skiing, kayaking, snowshoes) and are allowed despite the ‘mechanized travel’ ban. Yet it seems that some groups lobby extensively to restrict access to mountain biking on public land, simply on the basis that their presence detracts from the wilderness experience.
Case in point — over 250,000 acres of newly designated Wilderness within the Boulder-Whiteclouds National Forest in Idaho. Changes to the bill were made to accommodate hikers, equestrians and motorized users. Mountain biking, including riding on established, low-visitation alpine routes, was banned outright.
Enter the Sustainable Trails Coalition. They are not in conflict with the established International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA), but their 501-c-4 status allows them to hire lobbyists. I say it is about time for a mountain bike lobby — the likes of which the motorized groups, wilderness groups and resource extraction have already had for decades. The alternative is continuing to lose access to established trails in otherwise beneficial Wilderness designations.
I care deeply about the preservation of our wonderful public lands and access to recreation. And I think a discussion about lifting an outright ban on mountain biking in all wilderness areas, beyond the scope of the article, is warranted.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.
Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.
Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User