Letter to the editor: Can’t compare existing vaccinations with emergency-use injections
Breckenridge
Letter writer Chuck Savall’s misguided attempt to argue against equal rights would be laughable if it wasn’t so insidious. Please go read the Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg Code, the Civil Rights Act and U.S. Code 21 360bbb-3 for some history precedence.
Yes, we draw the line when you start comparing existing vaccinations with completed clinical and safety trials and decades of long-term data behind them to these rushed, emergency-use authorization injections never before tried in humans. That’s called a false equivalency.
I have two family members seriously injured from the COVID-19 vaccines. Where there is risk there must be a choice — period.
Look at the data coming out of two of the most vaccinated countries in the world right now, Israel and Iceland, and look up the explanation from the self-described inventor of mRNA vaccines himself, Dr. Robert Malone.
This experiment has failed and no amount of mandates, virtue signaling and moral superiority will change that.
Studies show natural immunity to be more robust and longer lasting than vaccine-induced antibodies. I’m doing my part for herd immunity. Instead of waging fingers and making assumptions, perhaps Savall should follow the science and data. And maybe a good ol’ Ethics 101 course would do him good, too.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.
Summit Daily is embarking on a multiyear project to digitize its archives going back to 1989 and make them available to the public in partnership with the Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. The full project is expected to cost about $165,000. All donations made in 2023 will go directly toward this project.
Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.