Why fly fishers hate Ted Turner
Last January Fly Rod & Reel magazine made Ted Turner its Angler of the Year, thereby unleashing a blizzard of nasty-grams. Most correspondents opened with harangues about Turner1s liberal politics, then alleged that he1s done nothing for fly fishing.Fly Rod & Reel, mailed six times a year to 62,000 subscribers, pays me about $37 a day if you divide dollars earned for my 3,000-word column by days worked. But it1s the only hook-and-bullet magazine that publishes investigative reporting on gut environmental issues, or dares to criticize sportsmen when they climb into bed with their worst enemies.Not coincidentally, the magazine is one of the very few hook-and-bullet publications that is profitable and growing. There are lots of facts sportsmen don1t want to know, but there are also lots of sportsmen who crave instruction on how to help fish and wildlife.For 15 years my assignment has been to promote native fish restoration.So when Ted Turner offered to host and underwrite the most ambitious project ever undertaken to save westslope cutthroat trout I jumped on the story.The fish has been nearly extirpated by professional and amateur bucket-biologists who have polluted its habitat with trout that don1t belong.Westslope cutthroats are suppressed by browns from Europe and brook trout from the East, or hybridized out of existence by rainbows from the Pacific Northwest and other cutthroats from around the West.Accordingly, the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks hatched a recovery plan whereby 10 healthy westslope populations will be established in five distinct drainages. By far the most promising sanctuary is upper Cherry Creek in southwest Montana. The department wants to use the safe and short-lived chemicals rotenone and antimycin to kill the brook trout, rainbows and Yellowstone cutthroats that currently infest its 77 miles.Then it would release westslopes.Turner, who owns much of the watershed and has done a spectacular job restoring it, has agreed to pick up $343,350 of the $475,000 tab.You1d think fly fishers would be ecstatic. After all, westslope cutthroats evolved in these streams and grow faster and bigger than the aliens.But there1s a more important consideration: When a person fishes in degraded habitat for fish that don’t belong, fly fishing is a mere 3sport3<like bowling. When a person pursues wild, native fish in pristine habitat, fly fishing becomes more meaningful, and the fly fisher is elevated to a participant in nature instead of being just a taker.But Ted Turner puts up 3no trespassing signs, so on most of his ranch you have to wade or float Cherry Creek to fish. Angry at the inconvenience, local guides and anglers have spread the untruth that Turner has thrown in with the Mountain States Legal Foundation to overturn Montana’s stream-access law.First to attack Turner for the sin of exercising his property rights was a property-rights group called the Public Lands Access Association. Its current lawsuit<alleging that rotenone and antimycin are pollution<has held up the restoration project since Oct. 31, 2000. Recycling the association’s fantasies has been Outdoor Life magazine, in which sources utterly bereft of credentials but not opinions whoop it up for alien and mongrel trout.While Fly Rod & Reel heard from Turner supporters, too, they were out-shouted. We were informed that we were 3butt kissing,3 that we 3might better have selected Osama bin Laden,3 that Turner 3could care less about native trout…unless it might apply to his own delusional self-image, possible tax breaks or increased wealth,3 that he is a 3land hoarder,3 a 3terrorist,3 a 3leftist elitist.3The Angler of the Year isn’t picked by me; but somehow the choice of a native-fish-loving land poster was deemed my fault. My 3selection3 of Turner proved that: I had 3a political agenda,3 I’d done it for money, I was a 3snot nose,3 a 3moron,3 a 3Nature Nazi,3 an acolyte of 3Hanoi Jane,3 an espouser of 3vitriolic leftist environmentalism,3 a 3nasty bully,3 3the James Carville of the fly fishing world.3For too many fly fishers, the definition of doing something for fly fishing isn’t ensuring their sport by saving a part of earth1s genetic wealth. It’s inviting them onto private property to angle for weed fish.I1d say my $37-a-day work trying to convince sportsmen that native fish are worth saving isn’t going to be finished real soon. Meanwhile, one fly fisherman needs to say thanks to Ted Turner.Ted, Thanks!Ted Williams is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News in Paonia, Colo. (hcn.org).
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.
Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.
Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User